By MARC McDONALD
One might expect that any rational, clear-thinking adult would wait to actually see a movie before they decide to attack it.
However, there are three things that are certain in life: death, taxes, and the fact that the wingnuts will do whatever they can to slime Michael Moore and his work.
After all, Moore is the anti-Christ to these people. He's been detested by the right wing ever since he dared to speak out against George W. Bush in Fahrenheit 9/11.
It was all enough to make right-wing writer and Fox News commentator Bernie Goldberg rank Moore as No. 1 in his 2005 tirade, 100 People Who Are Screwing Up America.
Never mind the fact that Moore has been vindicated, time and time again.
The current wave of Moore-bashing seems to date back to his "infamous" March 2003 Oscar-night speech. The press reports I read about that event focused solely on the fact that his comments drew boos from some audience members.
Few people, though, seem to remember exactly what Moore said that night, a mere three days after the U.S. launched its war on Iraq.
"We live in a time where we have a man who's sending us to war for fictitious reasons," Moore said, thus throwing a wrench into the carefully choreographed TV event beamed around the world.
In hindsight, of course, this comment has turned out to be amazingly prescient. The Bush team's stated rationale for the war has been shown to be, indeed, fiction.
Since then, Bush's once-sky-high approval ratings have sunk into the toilet. Indeed, a majority of Americans today believe that the Iraq War wasn't worth it. It took a few years, but Americans finally came around to Moore's views about Bush and the war.
Of course, Moore wasn't the first commentator to attack Bush. But he was the first to really draw blood, during a time when the MSM was fawning over Bush.
And the wingnuts have never forgiven Moore.
In attacking Sicko, the right-wingers have wasted no time in smearing Moore and his film. Never mind the fact that the movie won't even be released in the U.S. until June 29.
The popular movie reference site, IMDB.com shows how polarizing a film Sicko, is already, despite the fact that it is a month away from release. As of May 27, already 39 people had voted to give the film a rating of "1" on a scale of 1-to-10. It's unclear as to how these people have managed to see the film, considering that it has only played to a relative handful of people at the Cannes Film Festival in France (where, by all accounts, it was rapturously received by adoring crowds).
How much do you want to bet that those 39 thumbs-down votes were from Rush-listening wingnuts here in the States who haven't seen the film (and have no intention of doing so)?
Fox News propagandist Sean Hannity is helping to lead the charge against Sicko. Recently, he has repeatedly claimed that the U.S. has "the world's best health-care system." It's a mantra that we can expect to hear repeated, ad nauseam, over the next few months.
In the coming weeks, we can expect a predictable chorus attacking Sicko, from both HateWing radio, and the nutcase wingnut blogs.
I expect that the right-wing will roll out the really heavy artillery on the eve of Sicko's release (just as the wingnuts did when Fahrenheit 9/11 was released).
Recall how the right-wing British writer Christopher Hitchens slammed F9/11 in a high-profile Slate review on June 21, 2004 that was titled, "The lies of Michael Moore."
Time hasn't been kind to Hitchens' review, which served up a heavy dose of spurious "evidence," trying to defend Bush's case for war (most of which, of course, has now been completely debunked).
Hitchens also accused Moore of "cowardice," a bizarre charge, considering that Moore was inundated with death threats in the aftermath of F9/11.
Indeed, even many theater owners who showed F9/11 received death threats. Although there's no way to be sure exactly who was making these threats, one can be sure that they weren't liberal Democrats. And if anyone was guilty of "cowardice," it was the mainstream journalists (of which Hitchens is a member) who helped sell Bush's war to the American people.
I expect the right-wing will do whatever it can to tarnish Sicko and slime Moore in the weeks to come.
But it's clear that the wingnuts have their work cut out for them, if they're going to try to convince Americans that Sicko's indictment of the U.S. health-care system is false.
After all, polls have repeatedly indicated that a majority of Americans want the government to step in and do whatever it takes to provide health-care to everyone. Additionally, most Americans have horror stories of their own in dealing with HMOs and the health-care system.
Wingnuts like Hannity can babble on all day about how America supposedly has the best health-care system in the world. But I suspect that most Americans are no longer buying this crap. We as a people know that there's something seriously wrong with our system. And no amount of propaganda and Fox News disinformation will change that fact.
An Effective Pro-Worker Policy
24 minutes ago
9 comments:
Time hasn't been kind to Hitchens' review...
Indeed.
www.overcast.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/f911/hitch-moore.htm
I'm not sure what happened to Hitchens, who used to be one of the left's most brilliant spokesmen. Sometime after 9/11 he seemed to become obsessed with fighting "Islamo-fascism," and eventually was feuding violently with anyone who disagreed with him. It may be a case for a psychiatrist (and, from what I've read, perhaps the Betty Ford Center).
I'm not that familiar with Hitchens' work pre-9/11, but it seems to me that he spends most of his time strongly defending Bush these days. He also constantly praises America's freedoms and our Constitution. I'm not sure if he recognizes the irony of praising both Bush AND the Constitution, (which Bush has used as toilet paper since Day One).
As for Sean Hannity's assertion that the US has the best health care in the world, I'm sure that Sean Hannity's health care is indeed comprehensive and utterly reliable.
Too bad he doesn't give a shit for the thousands of families who went broke and bankrupt (where the new bankruptcy law still allows it)owing to an unexpected illness and lack of any insurance.
I dare Hannity to debate this issue with someone truly knowledgeable about the state of health care and health insurance in our country.
He will not do it.
Sean Hannity is without education, without ethics, and without shame.
He is a paid liar.
That's just the truth, and maybe that's why he avoids the truth as if his life depended on it.
Come to think of it....
I disagree with Manifesto Joe. I don't Hitchens was all that great before his transformation into a repulsive and ridiculous shill for empire. He was always something of a careerist gratuitously contrarian hack who was more interested in making money and seeking attention by generating superfluous controversy than in fighting for justice or left causes.
It might interest you to know that Moore is highly regarded in Australia. I talk to people all the time who mention that they've seen his films, and I've even met a few who are familiar with "TV Nation," the political-satirical show he had on Fox during the early 90s. MM is how Aussies develop a lot of their viewpoint on the U.S.
Found your blog as a result of your comments on Pottersville. Good stuff, mate!
Hi Bukko, thanks for your comments. Speaking of Moore, I also recommend that you check out his other TV series, "The Awful Truth." Personally, I think that's some of the best work he's ever done. By the way, you can view most, if not all of it, on YouTube.com.
Hi Jay Diamond, thanks for your comments. Yes, Hannity and the rest of the right-wing slime machine are going to have a tough time defending the U.S. health-care system when they attack "Sicko." (Sure, they'll try, but they're simply going to come off as looking foolish when they repeatedly claim that the U.S. has "the best health care in the world").
I just had the pleasure of previewing Sicko, and I can't wait to see it in the theater. I want to see and feel the audience reaction. I want to buy several copies to have on hand for opinionated friends who have not seen it.
Everyone who has medical bills, or friends and family with medical bills, should be able to relate to the facts of the message. After all, how can you defend yourself when ill and sickly?
The spin from this administration's mouthpieces should be great linguistic acrobatics. I'm sure they and their partners in the health and drug industries have already seen this, and are getting worried.
Imagine enough citizens agreeing that it is important for our nation that our citizens be as healthy as possible. Imagine them standing together in informing our elected officials that we want it fixed.
We want it fixed; there is an election coming up, and we are watching you. Imagine the fear in DC, on K Street, and in certain board rooms.
You are the "We" in "We the People."
WhichTruth
Post a Comment