Friday, September 11, 2009

I'm Thinking About Killing Glenn Beck


"Hang on, let me just tell you what I'm thinking. I'm thinking about killing Glenn Beck, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire somebody to do it. No, I think I could."

No doubt, the above quote is provoking two main reactions from those who've stumbled across this blog today:

1. Progressives, (who are wondering what's going on and horrified that I would talk about violence against another human being).

2. Conservatives, (who are outraged and angry that I would say such as thing about their hero, Beck).

But I wrote the above quote to prove a point.

That is: Wingnuts like Beck can literally get away with anything they say, and face no real repercussions. After all, all I did with the above quote is take a May 2005 quote that Beck made and I substituted the words "Glenn Beck" for "Michael Moore"----the words Beck used in the original quote.

Since Beck made that quote in 2005, his career has gone from strength to strength. Last year, he made over $23 million. His audience and influence continues to soar. This, despite the fact that he continues to spew out crazy, violent rhetoric like his 2005 quote about killing Moore.

And yet, if anyone on the Left makes even a mildly controversial remark, it will dog them to the end of time (and almost certainly end their career).

Recall that all Howard Dean ever did was give out an enthusiastic shout to his supporters---and that alone was enough to sink his presidential ambitions. He didn't even say anything controversial, for Chrissakes.

But the Right-Wing these days pretty much about to get away with murder, and face zero repercussions. Beck can call the predominately African-American victims of Hurricane Katrina "scumbags" and get away with it. He can call the mother of a fallen soldier, Cindy Sheehan, a "slut" and get away with it. He can chillingly talk about killing Moore and get away with it.

Speaking of repercussions, I'm aware that the grassroots group,, is running a highly successful boycott against Beck's Fox News program. Thus far, they've managed to persuade over 60 advertisers to stop sponsoring Beck's hate.

I strongly applaud what is doing. But I'm not entirely convinced that Beck will ever face any real repercussions as a result of this boycott. Advertisers, after all, are likely to just switch to other Fox News programs. As long as Beck's 3 million-plus viewership continues to rise (which is in fact the case), I doubt Beck is going to lose his show anytime soon, boycott or not.

There's another point I've been trying to make by quoting Beck's hate speech. That is: We progressives are a bunch of wussies. We let the wingnuts attack us over and over and we don't even bother to defend ourselves.

Case in point, Beck goes after Van Jones (a co-founder of and the White House promptly throws Jones under the bus (seemingly handing a big victory to Beck---at a time when he ought to be reeling and on the ropes after losing all his main advertisers). Once again, the Dems managed to take a clear victory and somehow turn it into a defeat.

People: it's time we take the gloves off and start fighting back against these bastards, fighting fire with fire. I'm sick and tired of people like President Obama trying to "reach out across the aisle." For a change, we need to act like we're the party who won a clear mandate from the American people, instead of a timid, meek party that is afraid of its own shadow and lets the GOP sh*t all over us every chance they get.

By the way, if you don't support fascist hate speech polluting our nation's airwaves, then please support and sign their online petition.


Jack Jodell said...

RIGHT ON, MARC!!! You are very correct about the double standard found in our corporatist "mainstream" media when it comes to controversial statements made by those on the left versus those made by right-wingers. You are also correct to urge those of us who are sane to stand up and publicly call out the wacko wing-nuts on every one of their bogus statements. Let's go, progressive community. Enough is enough!

Marc McDonald said...

Hi Jack, thanks for the kind words and your comments.
Bill Maher once said it best: America doesn't have a party of the Left and a party of the Right.
Instead, it has a centrist party and a crazy party.

Dave Garner said...

For many years, Walter Cronkite was "America's Newsman."
Today, with his vast audience, I think it's safe to say that Glenn Beck is the Cronkite of our era.
You Liberals had no problem with Cronkite (a notorious Lefty). But you keep attacking Beck, just because he doesn't parrot the Liberal talking points.
No wonder the Democratic Party is a dying institution that few Americans take seriously any more.

Anonymous said...

Watching Glenn Beck (or Fox News in general) actually makes you stupid. Beck spews out an incredible amount of information and lies. Give him 5 minutes to talk and you'd likely need at least a couple of hours to sort out the record.

Jack Jodell said...

I nearly laughed out loud when I read Mr. Garner's description of Glenn Beck as a modern Cronkite, until it became obvious the guy was serious. Walter Cronkite had high integrity, a huge amount of journalistic experience, and a superb education and knowledge of the world before he ever hit the TV airwaves. Glenn Beck shares absolutely none of those attributes, and that's what makes Beck a charlatan and Cronkite the deservedly revered newsman he was.

Adorable Girlfriend said...

I agree, Marc! Glenn Beck and the false media outlets are deeply disturbing and worrisome.

TEGS said...

Glen Beck is just a little attention craving whore who feeds on the insecurities and fears of the ignorant 10% of our population.

Thanks for the heads up on

I'm on my way there now!

Vigilante said...

Don't kill Glenn Beck. Send him a bar of hand soap so he can start washing the blood of Bill Sparkman off his hands. I think it will take a lot of soap.

Adrian Peirson said...

Most of the media is controlled anyway.
Media Lies on Ron Paul